Sounds good as a game plan :) +1 from me. -- dims
On 3/28/06, Kenneth Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/25/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > JWSDP is CDDL, GlassFish is CDDL...Should we pack up our bags? :) > > Geronimo needs a JAXB Impl not just us. Not taking a JAXB RI > > dependency forces us to think more than give up. > > I'm not giving up, I'm just prioritizing :) I would submit that it's > desirable in any event to support the JAXB RI as "just another binding > framework", though I certainly was not suggesting that it be > privileged in any way. > > > BTW, there is already some code in the current SVN that calls JaxMe's > > schema to java generator. Not sure if the generated code works, IMHO, > > but getting that working that would be first step. > > I just filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-530 on using JaxMe :) > > I'll definitely move ahead with building more on top of JaxMe, but per > what I said above, would still like to tease out whether folks feel > that having _any_ (even optional) dependency on RI would be out of the > question (and if so, why? Just because it's not ASL?). Specifically, > I'm thinking that at minimum there would have to be code that > populated the in-memory WSDL model with a dep on com.sun.* classes at > build time -- even if those classes didn't have to be included in any > distro. > > thanks, > k > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
