On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 09:01 +1200, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > Does WSDL 1.1 define QNames somewhere to require prefixes? This > certainly isn't standard usage of the schema QName type. Schema > considers QNames with no prefix to be using the default namespace for > the context.
No, WSDL doesn't define that IIRC. However, when it uses the default namespace then its still a qualified name. So if the schema is targetnamespace-less then it still can't be referred to. Am I missing something? > I did a quick search earlier in this thread to see if I could find any > discussion of the topic for .NET or other frameworks, but didn't find > anything. But I don't see any justification for considering it an error, > either. So neither of the cases have irrefutable proof it seems :-). Sanjiva.
