I'll try it out, are there nightly builds available ? Thanks Simon
-----Original Message----- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 11:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [jira] Resolved: (AXIS2-515) WSDL2Java generates uncompilablecode. On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 11:37 +0100, Ajith Harshana Ranabahu (JIRA) wrote: > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-515?page=all ] > > Ajith Harshana Ranabahu resolved AXIS2-515: > ------------------------------------------- > > Resolution: Fixed > > I've generated the code and tested it against the salesforce service. > I got the successful answers and I'm confident that if we write an > application to utilize salesforce, the generated stub can be used > effectively for that. Excellent! Simon, can you verify this please? It would be idea if you could check it out now rather than waiting for the next release. > Here are the answers for the other questions > a) This is the default behavior. I agree that having a 5 Mb source > file is hard to handle but I've made sure that it works and the can > be easily compiled through the generated build file. You can use the > -ss -sd -g option set to completely expand the generated classes. +1. > c). Yes. This seems to be the case and I'll have a look at this. > Anyway I think this is better marked as a seperate Jira to keep track > of it OK. > d) Unfortunatley yes. Is that removable?? > e) The reason is that you have elements and types in the same name. > Since ADB generates classes for both toplevel elements and types, it > gives unique names to avoid conflicts. Can we improve this? In particular, it seems to me we only need to generate a class for a type if its used in a non-top level element. If its a top level elem then we generate the class for the elem .. Maybe its too smart of an optimization but would appreciate your thoughts. Sanjiva.
