On 4/6/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, here is my +1 :)
Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
> hi All
>
> Lets have a release candidate of Axis2, on 7th April (if everything goes
> well), put up on a publicly available place on Apache, so that anyone
> interested can download and test it. This will not be a formal release,
> but this will become the RC for 1.0 release.
>
> Lets leave the release candidate for about one week. If everything goes well, lets release Axis2 1.0 on 21st April, 2006.
>
> And I did not get enough +1 for the RC1 :(, dose that mean you guys are not happy with the RC1.
>
> any comments ...
>
> ~Deepal
>
> Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>
>> Big +1 for moving ahead with this plan .. we've been working at this for
>> a long time and its time to draw the line and declare our first victory.
>> Of course 1.0 is not the end of the road and we have a lot more good
>> stuff to come!
>>
>> Sanjiva.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 15:58 +0600, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
>>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've been working towards a 1.0 for a long time and as discussed in
>> the thread http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=114285537804599&w=2,
>>
>> I would like to propose the following plan for the release.
>>
>> 1. Fix items listed in the wiki at
>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Axis2/releases/1.0
>> 2. Do a release candidate (since we don not have the notion of
>> RC's this would be called 0.96)
>> (Features and API's will be frozen in this point)
>> 3. Leave the RC for about a week or so for the people to play
>> around and find issues (which might be there)
>> 4. name the .96 release as 1.0 and do a formal 1.0 release (with
>> bugs fixed of course)
>>
>>
>> here is my +1 for the release .
>>
>
