Hi Jens; we will definitely fix the issue before 1.0
Jens Schumann wrote: >Resend because of broken web client. Hope this gets through this time. >------------------------------------------------------------ > >Deepal, > >luckily you just closed AXIS2-580;). > >In my opinion (and short time using axis2) there are two criticial issues >left which I would love to see fixed before axis2 release 1 going final: > >Number one is the overall wsdl import/include handling which Dims pointed >out today: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=114533232229865&w=2. >Number two looks like a cosmetic issue, however it has a deep impact on >axis2 webservice implementations and should be fixed: >http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-573. If you don't support this >your users will generate databindings with akward packages which can't be >easily fixed later on. So assuming we are looking for axis1 release >schedules people will sit for years before they can switch to custom >package names;) > >Jens > > > > Hi all; > > We released Axis2 1.0 RC1 on 9th April for user and developer review > > >(and still there to review) . Since then we found a few bugs (not > >critical and wont cause any API or major code changes) and we fixed most > >of them and I am sure that we can fix all the critical bugs that are > >require to be fixed before 1.0 in a within the next couple of days. > > IMHO we can stick to our release plan and we can release Axis2 1.0 on > > >21st April !!!!!!!! > > Prior to the release I would like to do the code freeze by 19th April , > > >since we have to test Axis2 to as much as we can. There wont be any new > >feature additions or API changes but we plan to fix the tooling after we > >do the code freeze. > > Thought and comments ...... ? > > -- > Thanks, > Deepal > ................................................................ ~Future > > >is Open~ > -- Thanks, Deepal ................................................................ ~Future is Open~
