Great. I wasn't saying no to new function, just want to make sure we put it in the right place. So HEAD it is - I look forward to it.
Cheers, Jeremy On 5/18/06, Chathura Herath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 to continue this in the head. This wont break the build and nor would disrupt the other modules which are operational. I will co-ordinate with Chinthaka for commiting this. It appears theres some overlap of our work. Thanks Chathura On 5/18/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 14:44 +0100, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > > > > So to get to the point ... if all/most users are fine with taking a > > new release which contains bug fixes and new function then lets just > > do Woden integration in "HEAD". If we want to cater for users who just > > want bug fixes then we probably need more discussion around branches > > anyway ... > > Absolutely +1 for new features and bug fixes; we're nowhere near ready > to say "no more function." > > Sanjiva. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Chathura Herath http://people.apache.org/~chathura/ http://chathurah.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
