As you might already know, the relationship type for a reply message in Submission spec is wsa:Reply. But the same in 2005/08 is http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/reply.
If we are sending "wsa:Reply" for 2005/08 messages then its a bug. If this is the one you are referring to, please provide me with a small test case and I will fix it. -- Chinthaka Brian De Pradine wrote: > > Glad that's sorted out. My main interest is to ensure that Axis2 has a > complete implementation of the WS-Addressing specs, both 2004/08 and > 2005/08. From what I have seen, this has already been done for the most > part, and I may end up just submitting a few more unit tests, and > patches for any defects that I may find. For example, I have already > identified that none fault response messages always include an > addressing header similar to the following: > > <wsa:RelatesTo > wsa:RelationshipType="wsa:Reply">urn:uuid:39C96FAC83790886C811489061932341</wsa:RelatesTo> > > > but, according to the WS-Addressing 2005/08 spec, this should be as > follows: > > <wsa:RelatesTo > wsa:RelationshipType="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/reply";>urn:uuid:39C96FAC83790886C811489061932341</wsa:RelatesTo> > > > I have already raised JIRA issue AXIS2-779 to cover this. I will also > keep an eye out for any other JIRA issues that I may be able to help with. > > Cheers > > Brian DePradine > Web Services Development > IBM Hursley > External +44 (0) 1962 816319 Internal 246319 > > If you can't find the time to do it right the first time, where will you > find the time to do it again? > > > Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/05/2006 09:24:35: > >> It should not be there, just removed that. Thanks for pointing that out. >> >> -- Chinthaka >> >> Brian De Pradine wrote: >> > >> > Hi Eran, >> > >> > The module.xml file for the Addressing module contains the following >> > description, >> > >> > <Description>This is WS-Addressing implementation on Axis2. >> > Currently we have implemented Submission version (2004/08) and Proposed >> > Recommendation. This is not complete as far as the fault handling is >> > concerned. But we are working on that. </Description> >> > >> > Cheers >> > >> > Brian DePradine >> > Web Services Development >> > IBM Hursley >> > External +44 (0) 1962 816319 Internal 246319 >> > >> > If you can't find the time to do it right the first time, where will you >> > find the time to do it again? >> > >> > >> > Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28/05/2006 19:31:28: >> > >> >> Hi Brian, >> >> >> >> First let me welcome u to the list :). >> >> >> >> Which module.xml is stating that ? We fixed most of the fault handling >> >> stuff when we were doing WS-A interop and I don't think there aren't >> >> much of work left there. >> >> >> >> But as Dims stated there are some issues we have which are filed in >> >> JIRA. We really appreciate if you can help with them. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Chinthaka >> >> >> >> Brian De Pradine wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Hello everyone, >> >> > >> >> > My name is Brian, and I plan to do some work on Axis2. I have > spent that >> >> > past few weeks going through the code in order to find my way around, >> >> > and I am now ready to get started. I was looking at the Addressing >> >> > support, and I saw a comment in the module.xml file that stated > that the >> >> > fault handling for Addressing has not been done yet, so I thought > that I >> >> > might start there. >> >> > >> >> > Cheers >> >> > >> >> > Brian DePradine >> >> > Web Services Development >> >> > External +44 (0) 1962 816319 Internal 246319 >> >> > >> >> > If you can't find the time to do it right the first time, where > will you >> >> > find the time to do it again? >> >> >> >> >> >> [attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Brian De Pradine/UK/IBM] >> >> >> [attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Brian De Pradine/UK/IBM]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
