Sanjiva, Can you please chime in on the problem itself [1]? Maybe if we concentrate on the problem in question rather than dissect the specific solution we will be better off?
thanks, dims PS: I changed the subject as well. [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-user&m=115158272830597&w=2 On 7/2/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 08:51 +0100, David Illsley wrote: > Sanjiva, All, > I'd still like to make this change. Have you been convinced or do we need > more discussion? I think we need more discussion. Are you suggesting that we ignore a RelatesTo with a relationship type of wsa:Response or with some other relationship? I do not agree that its correct for the WS-Addressing logic to ignore a RelatesTo with a relationship type that *its supposed to understand* even if the actual message ID is not recognized. If you are trying to do that, can you explain why you can't do the same with a custom relationship type? Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://people.apache.org/~dims/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
