Hi Dennis,
That's what I wanted to make sure !!! Thanks.
Maryam
On 7/4/06, Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Maryam,
This isn't a valid case. The only way to get complexContent from a
simpleType is by using extension (since restriction says that you're
only going to allow a subset of what the base type allows - which means
that the restriction of a simpleType is always going to be
simpleContent). Just to be sure, I tried this in Oxygen:
<?xml version=" 1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="urn:a"
xmlns:tns="urn:a">
<simpleType name="x">
<restriction base="decimal">
<minExclusive value="0.0"/>
<maxExclusive value ="100.0"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<complexType name="y">
<complexContent>
<restriction base="tns:x">
<minExclusive value="1.0"/>
</restriction>
</complexContent>
</complexType>
</schema>
It gave the expected error:
SystemID: /usr/local/tools/oxygen6.2/Untitled1.xsd
Location: 12:33
Description: E src-ct.1: Complex Type Definition Representation Error
for type 'y'. When <complexContent> is used, the base type must be a
complexType. 'x' is a simpleType.
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#src-ct
- Dennis
Dennis M. Sosnoski
SOA, Web Services, and XML
Training and Consulting
http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz
Seattle, WA +1-425-296-6194 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117
Maryam Moazeni wrote:
> Hi Ajith,
>
> actually I meant something else, I think what u mentioned here is a
> SimpleTypeRestriction which I think is handeled in
> processSimpleSchemaType(...), I'm not sure though. Please correct me
> if I'm wrong.
>
> But what I asked is the case of Complex Content when:
>
> *restriction.getBaseTypeName() instanceof XmlSchemaSimpleType*
>
> For example:
>
> <simpleType name="x">
> <restriction base="number">
> <minExlusive value="0.0"/>
> <maxExlusive value =" 100.0"/>
> </restriction>
> </simpleType>
>
> <complexType name="y">
> <complexContent>
> *<restriction base="tns:x">*
> * ....*
> * *</restriction>
> </complexContent>
> </complexType>
>
> I'd like to know what will happen in this case.
>
> Thanks,
> Maryam
>
>
> On 7/4/06, *Ajith Ranabahu* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> wrote:
>
> Hi Maryam,
> What I thought as appropriate for the simple type is to wrap the
> necessary type in class and build the restriction logic into that
> class.
> For example think of a restriction based on xs:string with a pattern
> like the following
>
> <xs:simpleType name="myType">
> <xs:restriction base="xs:string">
> <xs:pattern value="\d"/>
> </xs:restriction>
> </xs:simpleType>
>
> for this I suggest we generate a class MyType that wraps a
> java.lang.string. For the setter we can inserts a reg exp based
> checker that throws an exception (??) for a wrong value . How does
> that sound :)
>
>
> Ajith
>
> On 7/4/06, Maryam Moazeni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Regarding the complex content restriction:
> >
> > In the case that the restriction base type is a complex type,
> the derived
> > class overrides the getter and setter corresponding to
> restricted elements,
> > but how about when the restriction base type is a simple type?
> simple types
> > doesn't have elements !!
> >
> > in the current implementation for the extension of a simple
> type, the
> > derived class extends " org.apache.axiom.om.OMElement" and its
> elements are
> > added to the class.
> > but seems there's a different story for restriction.
> >
> > Any Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Maryam
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Ajith,
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for sharing your thoughts,
> > >
> > > For (1), (2) I was thinking of what you mentioned. So, you say we
> > shouldn't have the
> > > real Java inheritance here because of the existence of
> primitive types,
> > right?
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, I have already started testing some simple schemas with the
> > XMLBeans. That seems to be the only source for me :)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >
> > > Maryam
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/22/06, Ajith Ranabahu < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Maryam,
> > > > I've had the thoughts for the supporting of simple content
> extension
> > > > and restriction and complex content restriction (We already
> support
> > > > complex content extension partially)
> > > >
> > > > 1. simple content extension
> > > > This should generate a seperate class that contains the base
> type as
> > > > a field. for the variations, there would be other fields
> generated
> > > > into the class (say in the case of attributes). Note that
> extending
> > > > the classes would not work since there can be java
> primitives (like
> > > > int and boolean) and even if mapped to a class the class may
> not be
> > > > extensible (like the java.lang.String which is final)
> > > >
> > > > 2. simple content restriction
> > > > This should be the same as the extension case but now it
> would have
> > > > conditions generated into the the setter method of the base
> field. Say
> > > > in the case of enums there should be a list of constants and the
> > > > constants should be checked against the input value when
> setting the
> > > > value. Similar check can be done for the regular expressions.
> > > >
> > > > 3. Complex content restriction
> > > > Hmm... this is somewhat tricky. What I see is that we can
> extend
> > > > the generated class just like for extension but overrride
> the setters
> > > > depending on the restriction.
> > > >
> > > > One thing you can do is to see what XMLbeans does for this.
> Only thing
> > > > is they generate classes all over the place (:)) and it
> might be a bit
> > > > hard to figure out what is what :)
> > > >
> > > > Others please add your thoughts into this.
> > > >
> > > > Ajith
> > > >
> > > > On 6/21/06, Maryam Moazeni < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm doing a project for improving ADB for Google Summer of
> Code,
> > > > > At this point, I'm trying to implement the
> > > > >
> > > > > Simple Content Restriction and Extension
> > > > > Complex Content Restriction and Extension
> > > > > I'd like to receive sugestions from Axis2 Developers for
> implementing
> > these
> > > > > features.
> > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Maryam Moazeni
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ajith Ranabahu
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ajith Ranabahu
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
