On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 10:41 -0700, Bill Nagy (JIRA) wrote: > (Sorry that I'm a little late to the discussion; I just switched > machines and apparently my mail filtering is screwed up.) > > The plugpoint was indeed meant to be PM-agnostic, and I know for a fact > that when Tuscany integrates with Axis2 they will need this as well. > As Nick pointed out, the invocations have to happen at the PM layer, > as the PM may introduce thread-switches of its own, and that's the > only place that will know when all of those have been completed or > will know before they start. > > As to putting the LinkedList into the AxisConfiguration vs. the > ConfigurationContext, I had likened the migrators to modules, > transports, phases, etc. all of which reside in the > AxisConfiguration. At least on the client side, migrators are going > to have to be statically registered/deployed, as they need to be > invoked high up in the PM and not much of the engine will have > executed at that point in time. If you still think that they belong > in the ConfigurationContext, then I'm happy to move the List.
I haven't had a chance to go thru the patch yet .. any chance of sending a description of it? From the discussion I see its somewhat diff from what was originally suggested (which is cool of course). If u want to tell me RTFP I'll accept it :). Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
