Hi!

I had no luck with the question stated below in the axis-user list. Maybe some of can help...!?

BTW, I discovered some news here... When enforcing the creation of the "multipart" in writeContentToStream() in AttachmentsImpl to be done every time (by setting multipart = null), the header is included on the wire, but the attachement is then empty. I didn't get the relationship here properly yet...

Thanks, Luigi.

Luigi Lo Iacono wrote:
Hi there!

I encountered a very strange behavior while using Axis with several handlers and MIME attachments. I tried a bunch of different Axis versions including 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4. The problem occurs in all of them.

At the client-side I have two handlers in the global chain. The first one encrypts the SOAP body as well as MIME attachments (if present) and the second one signs the SOAP body. The encryption handler is an own development and for signing I use the WSS4J handler.

Without attachments everything works fine. The encrypted and signed SOAP request will be constructed and send via CommonsHTTPSender to the server. When an MIME attachment is present, though, the security header included by WSS4J disappears.

I did some debugging (essentially some more than only some ;-) and saw, that the SOAP request is full-fledge when leaving the global chain. On the wire the WSS4J header is not present. It gets lost somewhere in between. I debugged further and have the impression that something goes wrong when transforming the SOAP envelope to the bytes that are then passed to the OutputStream towards the server. Might it be the case, that the class holding the MIME multipart encoded bytes, doesn't get refreshed, when the WSS4J handler adds his security header? Again, the correct message can be retrieved from the MessageContext, but is not complete within the CommonsHTTPSender.

Any ideas regarding this...!?

Cheers, Luigi.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to