About the Async MR case.. I checked the code and things seem to have gone to the correct places...
But we need more testing!!! ~Thilina On 10/15/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Deepal did u update the AsyncMRs? Those need to change of course. Also, looks like you broke the Spring stuff; see the mail from Robert. Sanjiva. On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 09:28 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne wrote: > A quick comment... > > Did you test the Async message receivers... My instincts say they > might be broken.. > > Thanks, > Thilina > > On 10/14/06, Deepal Jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Thilina; > > > > Dont worry it wont break any thing (its a small change), and its API > > change we need to have that for this release. > > > > P:S - we discussed that in the mailing list and IRC before we doing that. > > > > > Hi all, > > > I would like if we can reconsider this commit... > > > > > > I know it's a bug, but at this point I feel it's worth to live with it > > > rather than doing major changes... IMHO a change like this needs to > > > be tested for a while... We need to learn from our past bad > > > experiences of last minute changes... > > > > > > Even at this moment I feel that this will get broken at the > > > AsyncMessageReceiver, since we are spawning a seperate thread... > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- http://webservices.apache.org/~thilina/ http://thilinag.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
