On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 14:00 +0200, Kai Hüner wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for your reply, I will change my wsdl to multiple wsdls, so > that it works with axis2. > > But I don't really understand your decision to only support one port > type for each wsdl. The wsdl specification gives this service > granularity decision explicitly to the service designer but you make > this decision fix by the architecture of Axis2. Of course, it is not a > really big issue and you can work around by defining a service for > each port type, but I think for standard conformity you have to > support multiple port types and bindings for a service. Is there an > architectural reason for this design decision? It would be good to > know, since I have to propagate this granularity decision.
Hi Kai- yeah there is .. see WSDL 2.0; we designed Axis2 to be modeled on WSDL 2.0. Also look at ServiceGroups - that's a way to deal with the limitation. Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
