Hi,
So I propose that we name the jars according to distro. Say like axis2-min-1.1.jar and axis2-std-1.1.jar.
Aha... There's another thread going on proposing to kill the min-dist.. So we can be better off with axis2-1.1.jar
Said that I'm 0+ on this... Even though we do this, there will be a considerable number of jars remaining.. On the other hand I feel that users will feel much more powered when they get separate jars for separate modules, so that they can drop and choose whatever they need.. I know it's possible to pull them off from the maven repo.. But life would be much easier when they arrive separately with the axis2-bin distro.... Thanks, Thilina
Ajith On 10/25/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Srinath Perera wrote: > > Hi All; > > > > For 1.1 are we planing to put all Axis2 jars on one axis2 jar. (When I > > purposed, Eran agreed .. no body opposed ...). ? > > > > We could keep all other jars in the maven repositories, but for the > > relase we can make a one jar out of all axis2 classes. > > +1 ( again :) ) > > > > > It is best if we can do same for Axiom as well > > Well, I do not agree with this. People some times doesn't need DOM jar > at all. > > Anyway, there was a request from Abdera team to take out SOAP specific > stuff from axiom api and axiom impl. We need to discuss that also in > commons-dev. Waiting till Axis2 1.1 hit the road. > > -- Chinthaka > > > > -- Ajith Ranabahu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- http://webservices.apache.org/~thilina/ http://thilinag.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
