+1 and I don't think its necessary to be able to build the *release* frm a src distribution. The src dist is the source of the distribution and its not meant to be the place from which to create a release. As such I agree to not putting the legal directory.
Sanjiva. On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 12:38 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Thilina, > > Let's leave the maven-std.xml as-is... > > -- dims > > On 10/29/06, Thilina Gunarathne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyway I've already completely redone the maven-std.xml to suit the > > current axis2 build... > > > > Thanks, > > Thilina > > > > On 10/29/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Eran Chinthaka wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about the end user experience I'm -1 on releasing the maven.xml > > > > we use during development and +1 for maintaining a new one. This is why > > > > we need to test releases properly before releasing them. > > > > > > Sorry didn't mean to -1 this and prevent anything, just wanted to say I > > > do not agree. Veto is revoked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://webservices.apache.org/~thilina/ > > http://thilinag.blogspot.com/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
