I am big +1 for this approach. Let's start that process immediately after 1.1.1 release .
Thanks Deepal Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: >Folks, I'd like to suggest that we try to do 3-monthly releases .. with >2 months of development and one more of wrapping up / packaging. I'm >motivated to suggest this after the debacle of the 1.1 release .. we >spent more than *6 months* releasing it and to me that's just crazy. > >Release early, release often is an important open source mantra. Given >that we're still in a fairly rapid innovation mode, this is even more >important. > >This also will force us to work thru a bit of a roadmap so users know >what features to expect in what version (to whatever extent possible to >do that in an open source project .. I'm not suggesting we plan >everything). > >Thoughts? > >Sanjiva. > > -- Thanks, Deepal ................................................................ "The highest tower is built one brick at a time" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
