-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Adding some more to Ajith's comments.
I think maven was not only a build tool for us. We were building our site using maven. And I assume multi-project management is easier in maven than in ant. - -- Chinthaka Ajith Ranabahu wrote: > Hi Tom, > I am neither an Ant fan nor a maven fan but I believe in picking the > "right tool for the job" :) > In terms of ease of maintenance and improved functionality i would say > maven is a better tool for the job than Ant. > I don't think dumping maven completely would be seen as a possible > alternative :) > > Ajith > > On 1/15/07, Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Chiming in *really* late on this thread, but I still don't see the >> advantages to Maven over JPA (Just Plain Ant). >> >> Sure seems like Axis2 spends more time worrying about Maven than we all >> did in Axis1 land rewriting our functional test system (and complaining >> about what we ended up with ;-). >> >> Why don't you just get rid of it entirely? Bet your build would go fast >> then. >> >> -- >> Tom Jordahl >> "Grump old Axis 1.x developer" >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFrZk5jON2uBzUhh8RApu/AJsFL6kLXU2QQR3dtbsiSnMK0s3GXgCgjuFs ZlRABcIbCEwozM0gqBMgVeo= =foTb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
