Hi Sanjiva, I wasn't making the point because I think that it is wrong (at least in this case,) I was making the point that the same process has occurred over and over again in the past -- meaning that there are lots of JIRA issues and even just commits that occur without discussion. I made this statement because, as I indicated, Matt's change didn't modify the API, so I viewed it no differently than other people shifting code around to fix other issues. I read through his change, compiled it, tested it, and it worked so I committed it. Had the API been modified or had it been a major modification I would have brought it up on the list just as I have done in the past.
-Bill On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 04:48 +0530, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 05:49 -0800, Bill Nagy wrote: > > > > I can point out 100s of instances of this pattern of modification > > without any discussion on the mailing list what so ever. > > This is the second time you've made this type of an assertion recently > (the last time was during the MC serialization discussion when you said > that there were lots of areas where things don't work as advertised). > > If you see a problem please point it out then and there without keeping > silent and then making a very general statement of community > malpractice. We're an open source project running under a fully open > model- if someone's not doing the right thing point it out, ask for an > explanation and then let's force changes as needed. > > Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
