Sanjiva,

>IMO its everyone's responsibility to make sure Axis2 performs well.
>Telling someone else to run perf tests, do profiling and then point out
>the place to fix is silly .. that person might as well fix it. Can't Ann
>write some tests and check the perf and confirm all is koshure??
>
>I'd prefer to be having this conversation with Ann .. not that I don't
>like to chat with you Bill ;-)).
>
>Sanjiva.

Do you have some specific concerns about performance?  Do you have
any specific scenarios to consider?


Ann
WebSphere Development, Web Services Engine
IBM



                                                                       
             Sanjiva                                                   
             Weerawarana                                               
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                          To
             ce.lk>                    [email protected]          
                                                                        cc
             02/01/2007 10:03                                          
             AM                                                    Subject
                                       Re: [Axis2] Issues with the current
                                       code base                       
             Please respond to                                         
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                         
                   e.org                                               
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       




On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 06:10 -0800, Bill Nagy wrote:
> Hi Rajith,
>
> Usage of the serialization is/will be configurable through Sandesha --
> Matt said that he would be adding code to do that (if it isn't there
> already.)  If the serialization doesn't get invoked, then all that will
> occur will be a few no-op method invocations.
>
> I don't agree with point 5 being a "definite no no."  I believe that it
> is a matter of personal preference and if the author of the code
> believes that it makes it easier to read and doesn't create issues then
> so be it.  Any reasonable editor today will have no difficulty locating
> the definition if you need to look at it.

I disagree- as an open source effort we should write in ways that
everyone can easily read and understand. These conventions are not
tailorable for personal preference!

It seems to me that most people declare variables at the top and methods
below. Is that such a hard convention to accept?

> As I said, I certainly welcome any concerned party to show me (in
> hard/accurate numbers) where the code does not perform and it will be
> addressed.

IMO its everyone's responsibility to make sure Axis2 performs well.
Telling someone else to run perf tests, do profiling and then point out
the place to fix is silly .. that person might as well fix it. Can't Ann
write some tests and check the perf and confirm all is koshure??

I'd prefer to be having this conversation with Ann .. not that I don't
like to chat with you Bill ;-)).

Sanjiva.
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
Director; Open Source Initiative; http://www.opensource.org/
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

GIF image

GIF image

GIF image

Reply via email to