Amila,
Did you figure this out?
thanks,
dims
On 2/7/07, Amila Suriarachchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,
Can we use a simple type union as an attribute type? in other words is the
following xmlSchema fragment correct?
<s:simpleType name="TestUnion">
<s:union memberTypes="s:string s:int"/>
</s:simpleType>
<s:complexType name="TestUnionElement">
<s:attribute type="s0:TestUnion"/>
</s:complexType>
if so what could be the serialized xml pattern?
I recently implemented the Union type support for adb.
For a example Lets take following schema fragment
<s:simpleType name="FooOpenEnum">
<s:union memberTypes="s:int s:string"/>
</s:simpleType>
<s:element name="Record1">
<s:complexType>
<s:sequence>
<s:element name="elem1" type="s0:FooOpenEnum"/>
</s:sequence>
</s:complexType>
</s:element>
for the above schema part the serialized xml is as follows
<Record1>
<elem1 xsi:type="xs:string>teststring</elem1>
</Record1>
does this xsi:type="xs:string part manadatory? (I think so)
Can someone comment on this?
Amila.
--
Amila Suriarachchi,
WSO2 Inc.
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
