On 3/19/07, Thilina Gunarathne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about falling back to the earlier naming conventions ,in cases where the the WSDL has just one port or in the case where user has specifically mentioned the port..
Ok then lets do it in this way. i.e. We use only the ServiceName for Stub, stub interface and callback handler class if there is only one port to codegen and other wise (in multiple port case) use ServiceName + PortName to make a unique class Name. It might get bit messy and complex.. But the above will make sure we
are backward compatible.. Thanks, Thilina On 3/19/07, Amila Suriarachchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks for your reply. > here you have pointed out two problems with the current multi port > implementation > 1. backward compatibility > 2. Length of the stub class name generated. > > so please send what ever your proposals to above problems. > Then we can improve this to minimise any problems which may cause to the > users. > > > -- > Amila Suriarachchi, > WSO2 Inc. -- Thilina Gunarathne - http://www.wso2.com - http://thilinag.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Amila Suriarachchi, WSO2 Inc.
