Hi, While I'm +1 for removing the explicit locked="false" attributes It may not be right to trash the concept right away. IMHO I see that this may become useful if Axis2 is in a hosting environment and the host would not want any of his users to override his settings. So I would say interpret the absence of the attribute as a 'false' but keep the concept
Ajith On 3/22/07, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not only do I not mind it but can you please also remove the entire concept? AFAIK we have *never* found a need for the "locked" vs. "unlocked" concept .. so let's just dink it. YAGNI and all that. Sanjiva. Glen Daniels wrote: > Anyone mind if we remove the explicit locked="false" attributes from > most of the parameters in the default axis2.xml? > > --Glen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/ Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/ Director; Open Source Initiative; http://www.opensource.org/ Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Ajith Ranabahu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
