First order of business...Please change the Subject line :)

-- dims

On 4/30/07, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,

On 30/04/07, David Illsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy,
> From watching a number of WS-Commons and Axis2 releases, it appears
> that neither project votes on release binaries in line with the way
> the Incubator does things, we seem to simply vote on the principle of
> having a release soon with a given feature-set. I don't believe that
> in and of itself that's a problem...

I guess I've got a bit more used to the Incubator-way lately :-)
Certainly WS & Incubator are two different communities so if there are
things from Incubator or elsewhere that the WS community feel make
sense in WS then lets propose / vote on them. I think voting on the
binaries is one which is used by other Apache projects as well as orgs
outside Apache.

>
> However, we've now had a couple of Axiom and Axis2 releases in the
> recent past where the need for an x.y.z + 0.0.1 release has become
> apparent within days of a release (the most recent at [1]). The impact
> of lack of community testing on real Release Candidates is, imo
> showing up in clear fashion.
>
> Given that, I'm thinking of proposing that we adopt the incubator
> method of publishing a real Release Candidate build + associated SVN
> revision number that we vote on, rather than voting on "having a
> release soon".

I'd like to help here.

>
> N.B. This isn't meant as criticism of anyone, but an observation that
> the current method seems to be producing less that ideal results.
>
> Thoughts/Comments/Suggestions?
> David
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-2607

Cheers,
Jeremy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to