On 5/18/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds good to me Azeez. - Should the name(s) be regexp expressions or just a simple "*" means (one or more characters)?
Let's make it regex. It will be easier to handle it with regex. - So is there a implicit <include name="*">? Should we allow folks to
set includes as well (like in ant tasks). Guess it's an overkill.
I think there is no need to have an <includes />. Whatever which is not explicitly excluded is included. thanks,
dims On 5/18/07, Afkham Azeez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great idea Dims. > > So under the ContextManager entry in the axis2.xml, we can specify the > patterns of the property name which have to be excluded from replication. > e.g. > > <ContextManager > class="org.apache.axis2.cluster.tribes.context.TribesContextManager > "> > <Replication> > <Defaults> > <excludes name="foo.bar.*"/> > </Defaults> > <ConfigContextProperties> > <excludes name="my.sandesha.*"/> > ... > </ConfigContextProperties> > <ServiceGroupContextProperties> > <excludes name="..."/> > </ServiceGroupContextProperties> > <ServiceContextProperties> > <excludes name="..."/> > </ServiceContextProperties> > <Replication> > </ContextManager> > > So any of the context properties matching a particular property will not be > replicated. > > -- Azeez > > > On 5/18/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Only other thing i can think of is similar to you know the proxy > > settings...have regexp based includes and excludes (on the key) in the > > ClusterManager for the default properties we already have and allow > > API access (and/or axis2.xml entries) for folks to add/delete from the > > list of includes/excludes. that's that other extreme... > > > > -- dims > > > > On 5/18/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Azeez, > > > > > > Did you already rule out a simple solution? If a service author wants > > > a specific custom property to be available, then they can add a simple > > > prefix to the key in the Map? > > > > > > thanks, > > > dims > > > > > > On 5/18/07, Afkham Azeez < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We have a problem when it comes to replicating properties in our > clustering > > > > implementation. There are some properties which are specific to a > node, > > > > specially properties in the ConfigurationContext. Some properties are > added > > > > by different modules such as Sandesha2, Rampart to the > ConfigurationContext. > > > > One thing is that these objects are not serializable, and the other > thing is > > > > that these properties should not be replicated. Some information which > are > > > > specific to a node may be added to the ConfigurationContexts, and > these > > > > should never be replicated. > > > > > > > > So there should be some way to inform Axis2 about the properties that > need > > > > to be clustered and those that shouldn't be clustered. > > > > > > > > I suggest we introduce a new Map to AbstractContext called > > > > clusterableProperties. Stuff that are added to this Map will be > replicated, > > > > and the service author/module author has to add the properties that > need to > > > > be replicated into the clusterableProperties Map. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks > > > > Afkham Azeez > > > > > > > > http://www.wso2.org > > > > GPG Fingerprint: 643F C2AF EB78 F886 40C9 B2A2 4AE2 C887 665E 0760 > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > > > > > > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks > Afkham Azeez > > http://www.wso2.org > GPG Fingerprint: 643F C2AF EB78 F886 40C9 B2A2 4AE2 C887 665E 0760 -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-- Thanks Afkham Azeez http://www.wso2.org GPG Fingerprint: 643F C2AF EB78 F886 40C9 B2A2 4AE2 C887 665E 0760
