Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > Eran Chinthaka wrote: >> 6. About faults, yes I also agree with you for some extent. When Deepal >> initially put that we had some discussions on that. >> > "Why there is a separate flow to handle the Faults?" > With my understanding, the handers to be invoked when there is a > fault, could be different form the handlers that could be invoked when > there is no fault. > (Going by the definition, a flow is a collection of phases and a phase > is a collection of handlers). Now it is questionable if it is really > necessary to have different handlers for fault path or the same set of > handlers could deal with both fault cases and non fault cases. Same handler chain can do the processing of fault and non-fault case , but need to have if statement to check whether it is processing a fault or not.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
