OK, well feel free to add a test where the addressing headers have
mustUnderstand=true set but I'd prefer not to change our default
behaviour because of a testing issue.
David

On 31/05/07, Amila Suriarachchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 5/31/07, David Illsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Um, can you explain what the problem actually is? We support
> processing headers with mustUnderstand headers, so what's the interop
> problem?

I can't really remember. But it happened at the
checkMustUnderstand(msgContext);
method in the Axis2Engine. Since Axis2 does not set mustunderstand property
when the
request comes from the axis2 does not give an exception and for .Net it
gave. I may be my
 mistake or anyother problem.

I suggested this as a precautionary step since if there is a problem then it
can be found at
the Axis2 to Axis2 testing.


>
> I'd be against setting mustUnderstand=true unless there's a strong
> reason as imo it'll lead to more confusion for users.
>
> FWIW there's already a property you can set on the Options object to
> force the addressing handlers to mark things mustUnderstand=true
>
> David
>
> On 31/05/07, Amila Suriarachchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi,
> > Currently, the must understand property of the addressing headers do not
set
> > for the
> > required addressing headers. There is no problem with this, since there
is
> > no compulsory requirement for that.
> > But MS implementation of WS* (WSF) set these attributes.
> > Therefore sometimes we get interop issues when processing the must
> > understand properties. So setting
> > must understand property true within the Axis2 would resolve these
> > incompatibility issues easily.
> >
> > So shall we switch on the must understand property for all the required
> > addressing headers if there is no
> > reason for not to do so.
> > I think it is better to do the same thing for rampart and sandesha too.
> >
> > if we decide to do so can someone go ahead and do the changes since I am
not
> > much familiar with the addressing.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Amila.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Amila Suriarachchi,
> > WSO2 Inc.
>
>
> --
> David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



--
Amila Suriarachchi,
WSO2 Inc.


--
David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to