I am 0+ on this , we had that interface and we removed , now we are trying to introduce it again.
Thanks Deepal > Glen Daniels wrote: >> >>> So I'm -1 on it .. >> >> Of course this is a VOTE not a code change so it's a non-veto -1. :) > > Absolutely :). > >> Curious - would you acquiesce if the vote ends up in favor, or would >> you actually veto a commit if one occurred? > > No way; but I assume that your commit would be a function of this VOTE > .. and since this is an API change consensus is needed to go forward IMO. > > So far we have 3 people's opinions. I'd like to see many more thoughts > before we decide one way or the other. > > Sanjiva. -- Thanks, Deepal ................................................................ "The highest tower is built one brick at a time" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
