(adding axis2 prefix)
Does this work for you? please see svn revision 547859.
*new AxisServer(true).deployService("className");
This seems reasonable to me. I have to agree that it would be better
to explicitly state the conditions in this case.
+1!
Dims, I think you've made a good point here about -1'ing. Deepal, could
you please revert your -1 after the discussion (assuming you're OK with
AxisServer having the boolean constructor param to allow controlling the
auto-start)? I'd really like to see dims' cleanup and API addition
re-committed. And all of us in the future should be VERY careful about
-1's to commits.
I was going to suggest using something like a (VETO) suffix to
distinguish "conversational" -1s from real vetos, but after some
thought, the presence of a -1 on a reply to a commit message really
should be enough, and we should be very aware of the veto power of a -1
IN THAT CONTEXT.
So a) Deepal, I for one would like to see your -1 reverted, and b)
thanks for the demonstration of what you were really getting at, dims. :)
--Glen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
