Can somebody explain the reasons behind the following change...This
change went in svn commit: r547986 done by Deepal...
Thanks,
Thilina
On 6/25/07, David Illsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd agree that this looks a bit odd and precludes a scenario we were
talking about only last week (setting an anon EPR w/refparams).
Can someone explain the intention here?
Thanks,
David
On 23/06/07, Thilina Gunarathne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> > fixing the issue.
> hmm... Fixing which issue :)...
>
>
>webservices/axis2/trunk/java/modules/kernel/src/org/apache/axis2/description/OutInAxisOperation.java
> Sat Jun 16 14:24:15 2007
> > @@ -189,6 +189,10 @@
> > useAsync = useAsyncOption.booleanValue();
> > }
> > }
> > + EndpointReference replyTo = mc.getReplyTo();
> > + if(replyTo!=null&&!replyTo.hasAnonymousAddress()){
> > + useAsync = true;
> > + }
> It seems with the above change Axis2 defaults to useSeperateListener
> if a replyTo address is given, even though the user has done just a
> serviceClient.sendReceive(payload);... I doubt whether this is
> correct...
>
> There can be scenerio's where users might already be having a listener
> up and running for the given replyTo address.. In that case trying to
> setup a new listener can give us lot of troubles...
>
> Thanks,
> Thilina
>
>
--
Thilina Gunarathne - http://www.wso2.com - http://thilinag.blogspot.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
