One thing I forgot to mention is about the data binding mechanism.. That can also effect the MTOM performance...
Thanks,l Thilina On 6/28/07, Matt Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, great. Basically I was just looking for confirmation that we can expect good rates using MTOM once we work through all bottleneck issues on our end. Thanks very much for the assistance and support. On 6/28/07, Thilina Gunarathne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Overall, have performance issues been resolved? > yes... We fixed all performance issues that were reported in the JIRA+ > more... We were able to upload files in to a server running in the > local machine with a speed ~ 5MegaBytes/s... (720 MB file in 2.3 > minutes)... We were using FileDataSource to read in the attachment and > used file caching in the server side... > > There can also be other issues like how you are reading in the > attachment before sending, what extra processing you are doing at the > server, etc,etc... > > Thanks, > Thilina > > > > Many thanks, > > > > -- > > -- Matt Friedman > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Thilina Gunarathne - http://www.wso2.com - http://thilinag.blogspot.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- -- Matt Friedman
-- Thilina Gunarathne - http://www.wso2.com - http://thilinag.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
