[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-2811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Davanum Srinivas updated AXIS2-2811:
------------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 1.3

> Assumption that message label and message direction are synonymous
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AXIS2-2811
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-2811
>             Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: codegen
>            Reporter: Peter Danielsen
>            Assignee: Keith Godwin Chapman
>             Fix For: 1.3
>
>         Attachments: AxisMessage.patch.txt, 
> AxisServiceBasedMultiLanguageEmitter.patch.txt, 
> WSDL20ToAxisServiceBuilder.patch.txt
>
>
> It looks like there's an assumption that message label and message direction 
> will always be synonymous.  
> I've been trying to create an Axis2 code generation template that would use 
> the value of a message's "messageLabel" attribute in a WSDL2 document.  
> Unfortunately, that value doesn't appear in the Document created by the 
> AxisServiceBasedMultiLanguageEmitter.  I looked into this a bit and found 
> that the actual value of the message label is lost in sub-class 
> implementations of the abstract AxisOperation method 
>     addMessage(AxisMessage, String)
> called by WSDL20ToAxisServiceBuilder.createAxisMessage().  
> WSDL20ToAxisServiceBuilder.populateOperations exhibits the assumption in the 
> for loop that iterates over the InterfaceMessageReferences.
> If I'm reading the WSDL2 spec right, the message exchange pattern defines the 
> label constraints for its messages. So, it seems like the classification 
> should be based on the message reference's getDirection(). While what's there 
> now may work, it won't if a new MEP is defined. I think getDirection() should 
> work regardless.
> WSDL2's ability to accommodate new MEPs also calls into question Axis2's 
> practice of mapping MEP strings to constant integer values throughout the 
> code.  Why not just stick with the MEP strings to support extensibility now?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to