Hi Jaliya,
 
Yes I mean RTT by response time, the client is on a different machine. I
am not using client side Axis. I am using System.currentTimeMillis.
 
Regards,
Firas

________________________________

From: Jaliya Ekanayake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 10:09 AM
To: Firas Khasawneh (fkhasawn); [email protected]
Subject: Re: measuring Axix 1.4 overhead


Hi Firas,
 
What do you mean by the response time at the client. Is it the Round
Trip Time(RTT) of the web service invocation?
The reasons you are getting the same time may be;
You are using the server and the client in the same machine and the time
it takes for processing at the server is not captured at milliseconds
resolution.
 
If you are in JDK1.5 or above try using, System.nanoTime();
You will get a higer RTT if you deploy the server in a differnt machine
than where you run the client.
 
Thanks,
-jaliya
 
 

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Firas Khasawneh (fkhasawn) <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
        To: Jaliya Ekanayake <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  ;
[email protected] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 9:45 AM
        Subject: RE: measuring Axix 1.4 overhead

        Hi Jaliya,
         
        I am using only server side Axis, for client I am using SoapUI.
if I put the handler in transport for both response and request, I am
getting the response time I am measuring from my client so looks like it
is measuring from the client side (the time it gets the request till it
releases the http connection)
         
        Thanks,
        Firas

________________________________

        From: Jaliya Ekanayake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 9:42 AM
        To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Firas
Khasawneh (fkhasawn)
        Subject: Re: measuring Axix 1.4 overhead
        
        
        Hi Firas,
         
        Are you trying both axis server and the client in a same
machine? If you put the handler in transport section, then what you will
measure is the time it takes inside the engine from transport handlers
->service -> transport handlers. One other possibility is to keep track
of the time in AxisServlet. Measure the time in AxisServlet before it
calls AxisEngine's invoke(..) method and after it is returned and you
will get the time for the total invocation.
         
        Thanks,
        -jaliya

                ----- Original Message ----- 
                From: Firas Khasawneh (fkhasawn)
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
                To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [email protected] 
                Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 6:06 AM
                Subject: RE: measuring Axix 1.4 overhead

                Any help regarding the below please? any suggestions on
how to measure the overhead Axis adds?

________________________________

                From: Firas Khasawneh (fkhasawn) 
                Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 11:50 PM
                To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
                Subject: measuring Axix 1.4 overhead
                
                
                
                
                Hi all,
                 
                Anybody knows how to measure the overhead Axis 1.4 adds
to response time? I created a handler in the requestFlow to  store
System.currentTimeMillis in messageContext and another handler in the
responseFlow that retrieved this value and subtracts it from
System.currentTimeMillis(), when I use these classes in the global conf
or transport (server side) I am getting values that correspond to the
response time the client is getting so it looks like it is not
calculating the Axix overhead on the server side, when I put these
handlers in the requestFlow and responseFlow in the service section in
server-conf.wsdd it gives differnt time which seem right but I am nti
sure if this is the Axix engine overhead? Any suggestions? other ways to
do this? please reply back to me or CC me if you are sending to the list
since I am not yet a member in this list.
                 
                Regards,
                Firas Khasawneh

Reply via email to