John, If the geronimo stax-api 1.0 is compatible with the codehaus stax-api 1.0.1 then I can't se why we couldn't swap the one used by Axiom... do you know if Axiom will work with the geronimo jar? David
On 21/08/07, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Axis2 and Axiom redistribute the stax-api-1.0.1.jar file from the Codehaus > StAX project under the Apache License 2.0, however it is not initially > distributed under this license. The jar file does not contain a license > file and the only reference to licensing on the StAX project website > (stax.codehaus.org) is "Open Source (Apache ASL 2.1)", but ASL 2.1 does not > exist. > > Does anyone know how the decision was reached in Apache to redistribute > this jar file under AL 2.0? Or where else I should direct this question to? > > My question is motivated by Apache Woden release management and incubation > exit criteria. Woden uses Axiom so it also redistributes the > stax-api-1.0.1.jar file, but I can't find any basis for the AL 2.0 license > used by Axiom for the stax jar. We've had suggestions previously to use the > Geronimo StAX API jar instead, but we really need to maintain the correct > Axiom dependencies, so we need to answer this question. > > thanks, > John Kaputin. > -- David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
