I hate to suggest something new (NIH) but maybe we could start an open discussion and forum on what would make a good BinaryXML/TCP model? If we came up with something significantly better then it would be worth doing.
Paul On 10/8/07, Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > I think it's an interesting possibility. I've been trying to find out > what .Net is currently using for their net.tcp transport, but that's > proving difficult. The Sun proposal is at least well-defined. > > I wish they'd asked for comments and started a discussion rather than > just making something up, though. Some parts seem lame, such as using > nibble encoding, and requiring a response message for every request > message (not necessarily appropriate with WS-Addressing involved). It's > also a bit heavy-weight, with a SOAP service request to open a channel. > > - Dennis > > -- > Dennis M. Sosnoski > SOA and Web Services in Java > Axis2 Training and Consulting > http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz > Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117 > > > > Paul Fremantle wrote: > > Guys > > > > We should develop a compatible transport to this transport: > > http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/10/soap-tcp-wcf > > > > Paul > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
