Saminda Abeyruwan wrote:
(2). Allowing CC or BCC is complex, as it is tightly coupled with the MEP.
- Simple solution would be to introduce a parameter or property to
include CC or BCC list and simply exclude them from the MEP semantics.
Thus, it would be same as broadcasting to a set of users.
- If MEP is introduced to CC or BCC, we could expect some complex
message exchange patterns. Would it be feasible or scalable to integrate
CC or BCC to a MEP.
You're over-reacting to what having Cc or Bcc means. Those are simply what
the message sender wants to do - they have nothing to do with the MEP.
There's no assumption of them replying - if they do, well, tough.
That's not a new problem- if u take ANY message with WS-Addr headers and
send it to multiple places (like what the split mediator does in Synapse)
then you could have that problem.
We just need to enable the user to set these properties and understand the
expected behavior of those receiving copies of messages. That's not unlike
in email .. if you bcc someone and they reply, then ouch.
Sanjiva.
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
