Sorry, The binding we are using is rpc. On Dec 20, 2007 8:16 AM, Hemant Borole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Amila, > This is the same issue that I have reported about limitation on the number > of operations in the WSDL. > I am not using the -u option, will give it a try. > I am using axis 1.4 > I am using document encoded. > Unfortunately due to privacy concerns I am not able to share the WSDL. > > > P.S. The issue reported by Man Tat and me are the same. Basically we are > talking about the same WSDL file. > > > > On Dec 20, 2007 5:13 AM, Amila Suriarachchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > what are the options you use to generate the code? > > do you use the -u option. is it possible you to send the wsdl? > > > > thanks, > > Amila. > > > > > > On Dec 20, 2007 1:33 AM, Man Tat Lam < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I am a webservices developer (just for a few months). I am using > > > wsdl2java ant alot to build the stub, binding and stuff. Everything works > > > fine (thanks for your effort). I went into some problem yesterday. > > > > > > I now have around 121 operations in my wsdl file, when I add one more > > > operation and try to compile it. The BindingSkeleton.java generated > > > by wsdl2java throw me an error > > > > > > 12: code too large > > > [javac] private static java.util.Map _myOperations = new > > > java.util.Hashtable(); > > > > > > It looks like there are too many operations and the Hashtable cannot > > > hold it. Can anyone give me some suggestion what I should do. I know > > > many > > > of you are very good designer and think I should refactor out some > > > methods. > > > In this case, I don;t think I have the options. > > > > > > thanks alot, appreciated > > > Merry X'mas > > > > > > mantat > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Amila Suriarachchi, > > WSO2 Inc. > > > > > -- > Thanks and Regards > Hemant -- Thanks and Regards Hemant
