+1
David

On Jan 24, 2008 7:01 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
> | +1 from me
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |              Brian De Pradine
> |              <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |              om>                                                        To
> |                                        [email protected]
> |              01/24/2008 10:24                                           cc
> |              AM
> |                                                                    Subject
> |                                        Re: [Axis2] JAXWS version in Axis2
> |              Please respond to         1.4
> |              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |                    e.org
>
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | Hello devs,
> |
> | Given that jax-ws 2.1 seems to be an important deliverable for Axis2 1.4,
> | and that people other than myself are starting to contribute to the
> | development effort. I propose to merge the contents of the jax-ws 2.1
> | branch into the trunk and to continue development in the trunk from now on.
> | The JIRA for jax-ws 2.1 [1] has been updated with the details of the
> | changes that will be moved across for anyone who is interested.
> |
> | [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-2722
> |
> | Cheers
> |
> | Brian DePradine
> | Web Services Development
> | IBM Hursley
> | External  +44 (0) 1962 816319         Internal 246319
> |
> | If you can't find the time to do it right the first time, where will you
> | find the time to do it again?
> |
> |
> | Nicholas L Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/01/2008 14:55:34:
> |
> |> Thanks for pointing out that JIRA Jeff.
> |>
> |> I created a page to jot down a few more thoughts on what must/should
> |> be done to get the deployment right. What's there is just a start.
> |> I'll keep adding to it as I think about this a little more.
> |>
> |> Any one else should please feel free to add any relevant information
> | there.
> |> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Axis2/JAX-WS_Integration
> |>
> |> -Nick
> |>
> |>
> |> [image removed] Jeff Barrett/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |>
> |
> |> Jeff Barrett/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> 01/17/2008 09:34 AM
> |>
> |> Please respond to
> |> [email protected]
> |>
> |> [image removed]
> |> To
> |>
> |> [image removed]
> |> [email protected]
> |>
> |> [image removed]
> |> cc
> |>
> |> [image removed]
> |>
> |> [image removed]
> |> Subject
> |>
> |> [image removed]
> |> Re: [Axis2] JAXWS version in Axis2 1.4>
> |>
> |> [image removed]
> |>
> |> [image removed]
> |>
> |>
> |> Hi All,
> |>
> |> I agree with Nick's suggestion of certifying based on JAXWS 2.1 rather
> |> than 2.0.
> |>
> |> In any case, we need to get the JAXWS deployment hooked into the Axis2
> |> deployment.  There's already a JIRA for that:
> |> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3223>
> |>
> |> Thanks,
> |> Jeff
> |>
> |> IBM Software Group - WebSphere Web Services Development
> |> Phone: 512-838-4587 or Tie Line 678-4587
> |> Internet e-mail and Sametime ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |> Brian De Pradine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |> 01/15/2008 11:17 AM
> |> Please respond to
> |> [email protected]
> |>
> |>
> |> To
> |> [email protected]
> |> cc
> |>
> |> Subject
> |> Re: [Axis2] JAXWS version in Axis2 1.4
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |> Hi Dims, Nick
> |>
> |> It would be good to get the code that is currently in the jaxws21 branch
> |> moved over to the trunk asap. There is also an existing JIRA to cover the
> |
> |> JAX-WS 2.1 development in general,
> |> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-2722
> |>
> |> Cheers
> |>
> |> Brian DePradine
> |> Web Services Development
> |> IBM Hursley
> |> External  +44 (0) 1962 816319         Internal 246319
> |>
> |> If you can't find the time to do it right the first time, where will you
> |> find the time to do it again?
> |>
> |>
> |> Nicholas L Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/01/2008 17:00:38:
> |>
> |>> Dims,
> |>>
> |>> Thanks for starting the discussion. I wasn't aware of jcp-open. It's
> |>> good to know there's an open forum for that information.
> |>>
> |>> Wrt. Axis2 1.4, my vote is that we certify based on JAX-WS 2.1
> |>> rather than 2.0. Brian has done a large amount of work in the
> |>> jaxws21 branch. We can merge that over and then get moving on
> |>> running the TCK and seeing where we are.
> |>>
> |>> -Nick
> |>>
> |>> [image removed] "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |>>
> |>> "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |>> 01/15/2008 10:19 AM
> |>>
> |>> Please respond to
> |>> [email protected]
> |>>
> |>> [image removed]
> |>> To
> |>>
> |>> [image removed]
> |>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> |>>
> |>> [image removed]
> |>> cc
> |>>
> |>> [image removed]
> |>>
> |>> [image removed]
> |>> Subject
> |>>
> |>> [image removed]
> |>> Re: [Axis2] JAXWS version in Axis2 1.4
> |>>
> |>> [image removed]
> |>>
> |>> [image removed]
> |>>
> |>>
> |>> Some discussion on jcp-open as well.
> |>>
> |>> [4] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jcp%2dopen
> |>>
> |>> -- dims
> |>>
> |>> On Jan 15, 2008 11:17 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |>>> Glen, Sandakith, Jeff, Nick, Rich,
> |>>>
> |>>> - I believe the jaxws-tck svn and the associated mailing list is
> |> ready.
> |>>> - cxf folks i am told are running JAXWS 2.1 TCK
> |>>> - Sun posted JDK 1.6 update 4 with JAXWS 2.1 inside.
> |>>>
> |>>> So, what should we do for Axis2 1.4?  I just saw Nick's jira float by
> |>>> [1] and wanted to kick start the discussion. Please see Steve's
> |>>> analysis [2] and the JAXWS change log [3]
> |>>>
> |>>> thanks,
> |>>> dims
> |>>>
> |>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3448
> |>>> [2] http://1060.org/blogxter/publish/5
> |>>> [3] http://jcp.
> |> org/aboutJava/communityprocess/maintenance/jsr224/JAXWS_2.1_ChangeLog.pdf
> |>>> --
> |>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com>
> |>>>
> |>>
> |>>
> |>> --
> |>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
> |>>
> |>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> |>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |>>
> |>> [image removed]
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |> Unless stated otherwise above:
> |> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> |> 741598.
> |> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> | 3AU
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> |> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |>
> |> [image removed]
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | Unless stated otherwise above:
> | IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> | 741598.
> | Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
>
> iD8DBQFHmOCigNg6eWEDv1kRAmUmAKDc/1eCLDjeGnz9bQLalNC7ZYxq9ACgmEzM
> iDBFSFlZBZ5nS41lWxq7mfA=
> =HZCt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-- 
David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to