-1 from me to move them to Synapse.

These transports (JMS, NIO, whatever) are going to be generally useful to any Axis2 user, so why make them go look in Synapse's codebase for them? I agree there should be a single place for them, but that place should be in Axis2, not somewhere else.

I'd much rather see a separate transports module in Axis2 for the ones we want to support (this has been discussed before), and perhaps a "contrib" module to hold transports that others might develop in the future.

--Glen

Davanum Srinivas wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Under synapse...Sure. Perfect.

- -- dims

Paul Fremantle wrote:
| I agree there isn't any point keeping stale copies in Axis2. What
| about building a separate module or even commons-transports?
|
| Paul
|
| On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|>  Hash: SHA1
|>
|>  Folks,
|>
|> Let's move JMS and Async NIO transports out of Axis2 into Synapse. There's
|> no point keeping a stale copy in Axis2.
|>
|>  WDYT?
|>
|>  Thanks,
|>  dims
|>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|>  Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
|>
|>  iD8DBQFIDdrAgNg6eWEDv1kRAt0hAKCL8ot+QCGAPGEJ9/OisXYnQXhs7wCgoFq7
|>  nJ5rX+dn2iaC7Fs9/+C+1LE=
|>  =/TIB
|>  -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|>
|>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>
|>
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)

iD8DBQFIDdwMgNg6eWEDv1kRAjPdAJ0TdqwjsTLvziHNa/9qC3z8HEkNfgCfQoZl
qTBtDY480X1XTokdxoojlEg=
=puTP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to