Glen, why ws/commons/transports? Why not ws/transports??
Even though we call ws/commons/transports or ws/transports those components only valid for Axis2. Therefore I can not see the value of having axis2 transport under WS [ I know I did +1 on the proposal.] :-\


We've moved away from commons in Axiom etc. - that is, packages no longer say that and IMO that's better.
Yes. If we are moving the transport to ws , then it should not be inside ws/commons , should be just ws/transport. But one thing we need to keep in mind , we should not change the package name. If we do so we loose the backward compatibility again.


With all these I think the time has come to think of moving Axis2 as TLP  :)

Thank you!
Deepl

Sanjiva.

Deepal jayasinghe wrote:
Glen Daniels wrote:
[ Please refer to this thread for context :
  http://markmail.org/message/lg3giq5kj74gjnxb
]


OK, let me make a concrete proposal here.

I hereby propose that we kick off a ws-commons "transports" project. As with the other ws-commons projects, this would have its own release schedule. All current ws-all committers would have commit rights, and we'd add anyone from the Synapse team that would like to work on transports, and isn't already a committer.
+1 for making a commons project for Axis2 transports. This will help both Axis2 and other dependent projects such as Synapse.

Each transport within ws-commons Transports would be a separate releasable artifact, i.e. "org.apache.ws.transports.jms" etc... and each such transport would be releasable on its own with an appropriate VOTE of the ws-commons committers.
Personally I would like to download all the transport as a single jar , but I do not mind releasing them separately as long as you give single jar as well.

Thank you!
Deepal

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to