Hi, We discussed about that in a mailing thread[1] sometime back. Why do you think we should change that? IMO it is desirable to have [service].[port] in the service address since it makes valuable binding information available for request processing at service side.
Sanka [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/axis-dev@ws.apache.org/msg40047.html On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Deepal jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Sanka and all, > > > When I deploy a very simple POJO service it generates following as the > service section in WSDL. As I know this is not nice and we need to fix this > as soon as possible. It is not good to have > "SampleService.SampleServiceHttpSoap12Endpoint" as the service address. We > did not agree anywhere about this structure. I even created a JIRA [1] > > <wsdl:service name="SampleService"> > <wsdl:port name="SampleServiceHttpSoap11Endpoint" > binding="ns:SampleServiceSoap11Binding"> > <soap:address location=" > http://10.100.1.132:8080/axis2/services/SampleService.SampleServiceHttpSoap11Endpoint > "/> > </wsdl:port> > > <wsdl:port name="SampleServiceHttpSoap12Endpoint" > binding="ns:SampleServiceSoap12Binding"><soap12:address location="* > http://10.100.1.132:8080/axis2/services/SampleService.SampleServiceHttpSoap12Endpoint*"/></wsdl:port><wsdl:port > name="SampleServiceHttpEndpoint" > binding="ns:SampleServiceHttpBinding"><http:address location=" > http://10.100.1.132:8080/axis2/services/SampleService.SampleServiceHttpEndpoint > "/></wsdl:port></wsdl:service> > > [1] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3794 > > Thanks > Deepal > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Sanka Samaranayake WSO2 Inc. http://sankas.blogspot.com/ http://www.wso2.org/
