Hi Dustin ,
I agree with you that removing the constructor is wrong , however that
one is misleading. Thought it takes the ConfigurationContext it does
nothing , and other thing is all the methods in Axis2 engine is statics
, so creating a instance make no sense to me.
If you want I can add the constructor back ?
In SVN commit 671127 the following public constructor to the
AxisEngine was removed:
public AxisEngine(ConfigurationContext configContext) {}
I realize this constructor was an empty constructor, and it did
nothing with the supplied ConfigurationContext argument, but it was
still a public constructor. In the future, would it be possible that
we deprecate such constructors/methods so that consumers of Axis2 have
time to appropriately react?
Regards,
Dustin Amrhein
--
Thanks,
Deepal
................................................................
http://blogs.deepal.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
