[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12616800#action_12616800
 ] 

Deepal Jayasinghe commented on AXIS2-3943:
------------------------------------------

Actually the reason I fixed that thing was , there were some confusion over the 
use of getSoapAction and getInputAction. IMO getSoapAction has to do the 
following

  - First it check whether there is any value for the soap action variable if 
so return that , else get the value from InputAction.

I am not sure where we use the output action , I mean we do not need that for 
any kind of dispatching. So SOAP Action is input action. 

In the case of test fail , is it happen in the server side or client side ?

Thank you!
Deepal

> server outbound message populated with incorrect HTTP SOAP Action header
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AXIS2-3943
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3943
>             Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jaxws
>            Reporter: Mike Rheinheimer
>
> Recently, Deepal made a change to 
> org.apache.axis2.description.AxisOperation.getSoapAction() in SVN rev 670462 
> to call getInputAction() instead of return soapAction:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/webservices/axis2/trunk/java/modules/kernel/src/org/apache/axis2/description/AxisOperation.java?r1=645181&r2=670462
> The latest CTS run has a server side inbound handler that shows a failure:
> 194932 [7/23/08 9:57:31:662 CDT] 0000002e SystemOut     O   result=FAILED: 
> unex
> pected value found in HTTP 
> SOAPAction:[["http://w2jrlr2745testservice.org/W2JRLR
> 2745TestService.wsdl/W2JRLR2745TestOne/echoStringResponse"]]
> So, I think this means that the client is populating the message with an 
> incorrect soap action header, due to the above mentioned change. 
> I would guess there are two possible fixes:
> 1)  make getSoapAction method "direction aware" so it can call 
> getInputAction() or getOutputAction() as appropriate
> 2)  revert the change in 670462 
> Deepal, your opinion?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to