> Hi Deepal; > > I am not really worried about the above use case (I have already > worked around this)--it was only a example. > > I come across this while working on something similar in my work, > AFAIK this is "the way" to determine a total order from partial > orders, and thought may be the algorithm is useful to Axis2 handler > resolution as well. Point is this logic is pretty complex and very > hard to get it right, and therefore using a well known algorithm > helps. > > Anyway, there is nothing like working code, and if people are happy > with current features we do not want to change it. I would not do it > unless majority strongly think this should be done. > > I am sorry Srinath if you get confused from my previous mail, I did not tell we should not looking into what you mentioned. What I told was you can get your handler resolution done with current impl.
And I think what Amila did was something similar to what you mentioned. As long as you do not break the current use cases, I have no problem of tuning the handler resolution. Deepal
