Hi, all SOAP styles except doc/lit are kind of deprecated by now and are no longer fully supported by most frameworks, if at all. You better migrate everything to doc/lit, resp. doc/lit "wrapped" I suppose Cheers, Wolfgang
--- On Thu, 8/27/09, Demetris <demet...@ece.neu.edu> wrote: > From: Demetris <demet...@ece.neu.edu> > Subject: SOAP styles > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org > Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 10:10 PM > Hi all, > > we have some legacy systems still using Axis 1.4 and we > need clients from them to generate SOAP > rpc/lit or doc/lit instead of rpc/enc - does anyone know if > the latter is the default for Axis 1.4 > and how it can be manipulated programmatically? > > Thanks > > Ruwan Linton wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Deepal jayasinghe > <deep...@gmail.com > <mailto:deep...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > No I can't, I guess I > have explained why I can't use it as well, > > > because I cannot > differentiate the undeployment call for the hot > > > update and real > undeployment. Well, what Amila suggested will work > > > though :-) > > Of course you can if the file > is there then that is hot-update else it > > is un deployment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose adding a update method to > the Deployer interface or > > > > passing > > > > > the state as an argument, > > > I > would consider undeploy as the update method you can do > > whatever you > > > > want there, and you can just ignore at > when it call deploy > > method. > > > > (I know in undeploy method you only get > the filename, but > > since your > > > > deployer is domain specific you know what > to do with the > > file name) > > > > > > > > > No, the issue is we need > to invoke a different code in the case > > of hot > > > update. > > Yes, as I mentioned earlier if > the file is there then that is > > hot-update, else > un-deployment. So it should not be a big issues. > > > > > > Anyway I feel I should go > for a synapse deployer :-) > > I though you already have > deployer for synapse. > > > > > > I mean a new deployer framework implementation, not an > deployer.. anyway synapse doesn't have a deployer yet. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Ruwan > > > > -- Ruwan Linton > > Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb > > WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org > > email: ru...@wso2.com > <mailto:ru...@wso2.com>; > cell: +94 77 341 3097 > > blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com > >
