+1

Andreas

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 00:28, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
<nandana....@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> regards,
> Nandana
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Amila Suriarachchi
> <amilasuriarach...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1, for release. lets finish with 1.5  :)
>>
>> Regarding your change,
>> I think same thing can be done with the existing code in the trunk or
>> earlier code in the branch by setting a following properties.
>>
>> MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager multiThreadedHttpConnectionManager =
>> new MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager();
>>             HttpClient httpClient = new
>> HttpClient(multiThreadedHttpConnectionManager);
>>
>>
>> configurationContext.setProperty(HTTPConstants.REUSE_HTTP_CLIENT,
>> Constants.VALUE_TRUE);
>>
>> configurationContext.setProperty(HTTPConstants.CACHED_HTTP_CLIENT,
>> httpClient);
>>
>> With your change since only one Connection Manager have to use anyway,
>> Then effective number of parallel connections is 2.  Other threads can not
>> use the connection
>> manager until one thread release it calling
>> serviceClient.cleanupTransport(); (even for the dual channel case it has to
>> wait until 202 accepted returns)
>>
>> Since anyway users can achieve this using the above method, IMHO this
>> change is unnecessary. So please have a proper discussion if you intended to
>> do this change to trunk.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Amila.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Deepal jayasinghe <deep...@gmail.com>
>> wrote
>>>
>>> +1 for the release.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Deepal
>>> > Hi Axis Developers,
>>> >
>>> > After fixing the documentation and a few other small issues since the
>>> > last
>>> > attempt at 1.5.1, I think we're ready to try again.  I've also
>>> > addressed the
>>> > "forced build of Axiom" issue with the CLOSE_WAIT fix - we now by
>>> > default
>>> > clean up the last operation context each time we build a new one inside
>>> > ServiceClient.
>>> >
>>> > While there may still be a few things we need to address (still waiting
>>> > for
>>> > transports / Rampart / Sandesha for instance), I think it's important
>>> > to get
>>> > this out ASAP since there were clearly some serious issues with 1.5 -
>>> > including the failed JavaDoc build and the persistent CLOSE_WAIT issues
>>> > that
>>> > are fixed in 1.5.1.
>>> >
>>> > As a reminder, fixes include:
>>> >
>>> >     *  Fix for the dreaded "CLOSE_WAIT" problem (JIRA issues 935, 2883,
>>> > etc).
>>> > We now share an instance of HTTPClient across each ConfigurationContext
>>> > (i.e.
>>> > each Axis2 server or ServiceClient) - connection reuse is now
>>> > automatic. This
>>> > means the REUSE_HTTP_CLIENT flag is no longer necessary or useful, nor
>>> > is
>>> > creating your own MultithreadedHttpConnectionManager.
>>> >     * Transport deployer is now actually functional, and
>>> > getListenerManager()
>>> > in ConfigurationContext now creates a new LM if there isn't one
>>> > already.
>>> >     * Fix for AXIS2-4034, module versions now support real versions
>>> > like "1.5.1"
>>> >     * NPE problem (see AXIS2-4114) fixed in MessageContext while
>>> > retrieving
>>> > policy.
>>> >     * Fix for JavaDoc build problem.
>>> >
>>> > I'd like to kick off a VOTE for the release, with the usual 72-hour
>>> > window
>>> > for votes.
>>> >
>>> > You can find the distribution files in here:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~gdaniels/stagingRepo/org/apache/axis2/distribution/1.5.1/
>>> >
>>> > And the M2 repository with everything is at:
>>> >
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~gdaniels/stagingRepo
>>> >
>>> > The SVN tag is:
>>> >
>>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/axis2/tags/java/v1.5.1RC2
>>> >
>>> > ...and I'll add a proper "v1.5.1" tag as soon as this release goes
>>> > final.
>>> >
>>> > Please offer your VOTE (and indicate binding/non-binding).
>>> >
>>> > Here's my +1 (binding).
>>> >
>>> > Many thanks,
>>> > --Glen
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>>
>>> http://blogs.deepal.org
>>> http://deepal.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Amila Suriarachchi
>> WSO2 Inc.
>> blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/
>

Reply via email to