RE: Log4J date in JAR file name

[Glen Daniels]

Title: Log4J date in JAR file name

Sam?  Is this because we don't want to force people to move to an un-"official" log4j release like 1.2?  (that rationale doesn't actually seem to work since the 1.2 classes will shadow the 1.1.3 ones if the new jar is on the classpath first anyway....) -----Original Message----- From: Mark Volkmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Log4J date in JAR file name C'mon guys. I'm betting there's some good reason why log4j.jar in the interim drops includes a date in the name. I'd just like to hear what it is. Can someone please tell me?   If there is a good reason, why aren't other JARs like clutil and wsdl4j dated? If there isn't a good reason then I'd like it to be named simply log4j.jar or log4j-core.jar. ----- Original Message ----- From: Volkmann, Mark To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:12 AM Subject: Log4J date in JAR file name What's the rationale for including a date in the log4j.jar file name or the interim drops?