+1 ----- Original Message ----- From: Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:49 PM Subject: RE: Auto-generated test case question
> > +1 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Russell Butek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:21 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Auto-generated test case question > > > > > > There's a change I'd like to make to the auto-generated test > > cases. Right > > now they call all operations from one method. The reason I'd like to > > change this is that if any operation fails, the test stops. > > I'd like to > > place each operation call into its own method so that all > > operations are > > called no matter how many fail. > > > > The only disadvantage I can see to this is that, right now > > all test cases > > have ONE test. If anyone has scripts that depend on this fact, those > > scripts will no longer be valid. > > > > Since that seems like a weak reason not to make the changes, > > I'll make them > > sometime this week unless someone complains. > > > > Russell Butek > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
