I just committed the support for simpleTypes as described below.
Try it out!
Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
R J Scheuerle
Jr/Austin/IBM@IBM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WSDL2Java and
xsd:simpleTypes
02/05/2002 11:47
AM
Please respond to
axis-dev
| Is this a known issue, and if so, what is the planned fix? Would it be
to
| replace all references to the simple
| type with references to the base type (or the first base type reached
that
| maps to a java type when traversing the
| base types?) or to generate the class that is referenced (e.g.
| FooSimpleType)?
I am working on this now. The planned fix is to replace the references
with the base type (first suggestion above).
Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
R J Scheuerle
Jr/Austin/IBM@IBM To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
US cc:
Subject: Re: WSDL2Java and
xsd:simpleTypes
02/05/2002 09:18
AM
Please respond to
axis-dev
The only simpleTypes that are currently supported are enumerations.
We will add your request to our todo list.
Thanks,
Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
Russell
Butek/Austin/IBM@ To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBMUS cc:
Subject: Re: WSDL2Java and
xsd:simpleTypes
02/05/2002 07:18
AM
Please respond to
axis-dev
Which version of axis are you running? I just tried it this morning with a
build from a couple days ago and it worked just fine.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Altenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/04/2002 06:31:08 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: WSDL2Java and xsd:simpleTypes
We're currently having issues with the way that wsdl2java handles simple
types that are not enumerations.
Currently, a complex type defined as this:
<xsd:complexType name="RootType">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="stringElem" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element name="enumElem" type="foo:enumType"/>
<xsd:element name="simpleElem" type="foo:fooSimpleType"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:simpleType name="fooSimpleType">
<restriction base="xsd:string"/>
</xsd:simpleType>
is translated into this:
public class RootType implements java.io.Serializable {
private FooSimpleType simpleElem;
public RootType() {
}
public FooSimpleType getSimpleElem() {
return simpleElem;
}
public void setSimpleElem(FooSimpleType simpleElem) {
this.simpleElem = simpleElem;
}
}
However, FooSimpleType is not generated, so the generated code does not
compile.
Is this a known issue, and if so, what is the planned fix? Would it be to
replace all references to the simple
type with references to the base type (or the first base type reached that
maps to a java type when traversing the
base types?) or to generate the class that is referenced (e.g.
FooSimpleType)?
Thanks,
David Altenburg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
