R J Scheurle wrote:
>
>You are right. The code in Axis does not have this bug, but I noticed that
>the deserializer code is extremely lame. switch (source.charAt(0)) {
Hey! ;-)
Unlike the code that it replaced, the code gets all of the correct cases
right and...
Nelson Minar wrote:
>
> Hah, no wonder I didn't understand how it worked! Well, at least the
> Axis implementation is efficient :-)
Yup. ;-)
In general, I subscribe to the theory that one should be conservative in
what one sends and liberal in what one accepts. In this case, we send out
only the canonical values, but accept a much wider range of inputs. And I
do believe that performance is a characteristic that some people look for
in SOAP implementations.
- Sam Ruby
