Questions about a --all flag: Do we call it --all or --emitAll? I prefer --all for brevity. Neither "a" nor "e" have been used in the shorthand version of any other option, so we have no restrictions there.
What is the relationship between --all and --noImports? We can say a couple things: 1. --all supercedes --noImports 2. --all refers to elements in the immediate WSDL file but not in imported files. I think I prefer #2. If there are unused types that are generated by --all, then do those types go into deploy.wsdd? I would say no since the service itself doesn't use those types. But that would make the code a whole lot more complex. (I'd still say no, but I'd grumble as I implement it!) What do others think? Russell Butek [EMAIL PROTECTED] "BEERS,NANCY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/06/2002 09:04:17 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: emitAll option in WSDL2Java Hi, We've been using Axis for our client proxy generation for the last two weeks and have been very pleased with the results. I noticed in a previous thread on this list that there was discussion about adding an emitAll option to WSDL2Java which would generate all of the classes (complex types, bindings, port types) even if they weren't referenced by any other items in the WSDL document. We would be very interested in this feature, and I was wondering if there has been any progress in this area (or if the idea may have been discarded for some reason). Thanks. Nancy
